ZVEREV-Bezwinger Shapovalov poses referee corruption

ZVEREV-Bezwinger Denis Shapovalov has taken care of the Australian Open against Rafael Nadal in his quarter-final match for an ECLAT. The Canadian attacked the referee fiercely and threw him as well as the other impartial corruption.

Trigger of this verbal attack was the beginning of the second sentence of the game. Naval had left a lot of time before he returned to the field after the interruption from his bank. Shapovalov was already waiting for a few seconds at this time to perform his premium.

The Canadian complained violently at the referee. You started the clock 45 seconds or so, and he is not ready, you’ve already started the clock for so long, and he is still not ready, Shapovalov cursed and demanded a sanction.

After he seemed absorbed and walked toward the baseline to continue the game, he returned again and turned back to the referee. After a brief worship, Shapovalov replied: Do you want to calculate me? Your types are all corrupt.

Naval is well known to extremely remove the time limit between ball changes. For interruptions between the ball changes within a game of a sentence, there has been a Shot Clock of 25 seconds for years. If the premium will not run during this time, there are warnings and in case of repetition a dot deduction. Between the sentences is a limit of two minutes.

Shapovalov apologizes: wrongly expressed

Naval had already shown himself in the past as a large fan of the innovation. I do not think that’s good for the future of the tour, he said shortly after the introduction of the new rules.

Articles and videos about the topic
Australian Open Live: Who will Naval’s opponent? Mongols demands Regretting
Top sport live on DAZN. Register now! Can be terminated at any time monthly.


In the match against Shapovalov, who had kept the tournament from the tournament in the secondary finale Alexander Zverev in three sentences, Naval finally retained the upper hand after a superior fighter performance. After the game, Shapovalov apologized for his wording. I think I’m wrong, when I said he was corrupt, he said. In his opinion, Naval is preferred, but he continues to hold: Yes, of course, 100 percent.